CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL ON TRACK? BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN COMPETING LAND USE ISSUES WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECT


15 Chap. L. Rev. 585 Chapman Law Review Winter 2012 Comments CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL ON TRACK? BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN COMPETING LAND USE ISSUES WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECT Kevin J. Grochow [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate, Chapman University School of Law, May 2012; B.A. History, University of California, Irvine, June…

SLAPPING CRIMINAL SPEECH: HOW EVOLUTION OF THE ILLEGALITY EXCEPTION HAS IMPACTED CALIFORNIA’S ANTI-SLAPP STATUTE


15 Chap. L. Rev. 537 Chapman Law Review Winter 2012 Articles SLAPPING CRIMINAL SPEECH: HOW EVOLUTION OF THE ILLEGALITY EXCEPTION HAS IMPACTED CALIFORNIA’S ANTI-SLAPP STATUTE Orlando J. Villalba [tippy title="*" header="off"]Senior Counsel at Mortgage Recovery Law Group in Glendale, California. I would like to thank all who helped prepare this article…

PUBLIC NUISANCE AT THE CROSSROADS: POLICING THE INTERSECTION BETWEEN STATUTORY PRIMACY AND COMMON LAW


15 Chap. L. Rev. 495 Chapman Law Review Winter 2012 Articles PUBLIC NUISANCE AT THE CROSSROADS: POLICING THE INTERSECTION BETWEEN STATUTORY PRIMACY AND COMMON LAW Richard O. Faulk [tippy title="*" header="off"]Partner and Chair, Litigation Department, Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, Houston, Texas. J.D. 1977, Southern Methodist University. Board Certified in Civil Appellate…

THE FCC’S ROLE IN REGULATING NETWORK NEUTRALITY: PROTECTION OF ONLINE INNOVATION & BUSINESS


15 Chap. L. Rev. 419 Chapman Law Review Fall 2011 Comment THE FCC’S ROLE IN REGULATING NETWORK NEUTRALITY: PROTECTION OF ONLINE INNOVATION & BUSINESS Caroline S. Scala [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2012, Chapman University School of Law; B.A. Communication, May 2008, University of California, San Diego. This Comment is dedicated to…

TWOMBLY, IQBAL, AND RULE 8(C): ASSESSING THE PROPER STANDARD TO APPLY TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES


15 Chap. L. Rev. 377 Chapman Law Review Fall 2011 Comment TWOMBLY, IQBAL, AND RULE 8(C): ASSESSING THE PROPER STANDARD TO APPLY TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES James V. Bilek [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate, Chapman University School of Law, expected 2012. For my family, especially my parents James and Karen Bilek, for without…

COURTS DON’T FOLLOW: REASONABLE COMPENSATION RULINGS AND THE EXACTO SPRING APPROACH


15 Chap. L. Rev. 343 Chapman Law Review Fall 2011 Article COURTS DON’T FOLLOW: REASONABLE COMPENSATION RULINGS AND THE EXACTO SPRING APPROACH Beth Stetson, Alexis Downs, Evan Shough, Dana Blake [tippy title="*" header="off"]Beth Stetson, J.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Accounting at Oklahoma City University. Alexis Downs, Ph.D., MTAX, CPA, Professor of…

FALLING BETWEEN THE ATKINS AND HELLER CRACKS: INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES AND FIREARMS


15 Chap. L. Rev. 271 Chapman Law Review Fall 2011 Article FALLING BETWEEN THE ATKINS AND HELLER CRACKS: INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES AND FIREARMS Jana R. Mccreary [tippy title="*" header="off"]Associate Professor of Law, Florida Coastal School of Law. This Article was presented at the Fourth Annual Florida Legal Scholarship Forum in November 2010…

KEYNOTE ADDRESS: “EX ANTE VERSUS EX POST APPROACHES TO FINANCIAL REGULATION”


15 Chap. L. Rev. 257 Chapman Law Review Spring 2011 Chapman University School of Law Transcription of 2011 Chapman Law Review Symposium: “From Wall Street to Main Street: The Future of Financial Regulation” KEYNOTE ADDRESS: “EX ANTE VERSUS EX POST APPROACHES TO FINANCIAL REGULATION” [tippy title="*" header="off"]Copyright © 2011 by Steven…