Home

RECASTING COMPLAINTS: AN ARGUMENT FOR PROCEDURAL ALTERNATIVES


12 Chap. L. Rev. 333 Chapman Law Review Fall 2008 Article RECASTING COMPLAINTS: AN ARGUMENT FOR PROCEDURAL ALTERNATIVES Paul David Menair [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D., Georgia State University, 2003.[/tippy] Copyright (c) 2008 Chapman Law Review; Paul David Menair In the time that has passed since the academic debate regarding “substance-specific” procedure reform…

EMPLOYERS BEWARE: VIOLATING USERRA THROUGH IMPROPER PRE-EMPLOYMENT INQUIRIES


12 Chap. L. Rev. 279 Chapman Law Review Fall 2008 Article EMPLOYERS BEWARE: VIOLATING USERRA THROUGH IMPROPER PRE-EMPLOYMENT INQUIRIES Captain Daniel J. Bugbee Copyright (c) 2008 Chapman Law Review; Captain Daniel J. Bugbee The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) provides a wide range of protections for those…

LIFE, LIBERTY, OR YOUR CHILDREN: CALIFORNIA PARENTS’ FIFTH AMENDMENT QUANDARY BETWEEN SELF-INCRIMINATION AND FAMILY PRESERVATION


12 Chap. L. Rev. 155 Chapman Law Review Summer 2008 Comment LIFE, LIBERTY, OR YOUR CHILDREN: CALIFORNIA PARENTS’ FIFTH AMENDMENT QUANDARY BETWEEN SELF-INCRIMINATION AND FAMILY PRESERVATION Kendra Weber [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2009, Chapman University School of Law. B.A. Criminal Justice, California State University, Fullerton. I would like to thank Frank…

NOTHING IS SACRED: WHY GEORGIA AND CALIFORNIA CANNOT BAR CONTRACTUAL JURY WAIVERS IN FEDERAL COURT


12 Chap. L. Rev. 127 Chapman Law Review Summer 2008 Comment NOTHING IS SACRED: WHY GEORGIA AND CALIFORNIA CANNOT BAR CONTRACTUAL JURY WAIVERS IN FEDERAL COURT Brian S. Thomley [tippy title="*" header="off"] J.D. Candidate 2009, Chapman University School of Law. I wish to thank Professor Henry Noyes for the idea for…

THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF THE CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL THROWS A CURVEBALL: THE USE OF JUVENILE ADJUDICATIONS AS STRIKES IN CALIFORNIA POST-PEOPLE V. NGUYEN


12 Chap. L. Rev. 107 Chapman Law Review Summer 2008 Comment THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF THE CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL THROWS A CURVEBALL: THE USE OF JUVENILE ADJUDICATIONS AS STRIKES IN CALIFORNIA POST-PEOPLE V. NGUYEN Benjamin Price [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2009, Chapman University School of Law; B.A. 2006, Brigham Young…

CALIFORNIA’S DETERMINATE SENTENCING LAW: HOW CALIFORNIA GOT IT WRONG . . . TWICE


12 Chap. L. Rev. 87 Chapman Law Review Summer 2008 Comment CALIFORNIA’S DETERMINATE SENTENCING LAW: HOW CALIFORNIA GOT IT WRONG . . . TWICE Travis Bailey [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2009, Chapman University School of Law. Thanks to Kris Warren and Mike Khalilpour for their support and insight.[/tippy] Copyright (c) 2008…

MEDICAL MARIJUANA AND THE LIMITS OF THE COMPASSIONATE USE ACT: ROSS V. RAGINGWIRE TELECOMMUNICATIONS


12 Chap. L. Rev. 71 Chapman Law Review Summer 2008 Article MEDICAL MARIJUANA AND THE LIMITS OF THE COMPASSIONATE USE ACT: ROSS V. RAGINGWIRE TELECOMMUNICATIONS Deborah J. La Fetra [tippy title="*" header="off"]Principal Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation; J.D. 1990, University of Southern California Law Center. Ms. La Fetra filed an amicus…

THE UNEASY CASE FOR CALIFORNIA’S “CARE CUSTODIAN” STATUTE


12 Chap. L. Rev. 47 Chapman Law Review Summer 2008 Article THE UNEASY CASE FOR CALIFORNIA’S “CARE CUSTODIAN” STATUTE David Horton [tippy title="*" header="off"]Lecturer in Residence, University of California, Berkeley (Boalt Hall) School of Law. J.D., UCLA School of Law, 2004; B.A., Carleton College, 1997.[/tippy] Copyright (c) 2008 Chapman Law Review;…

THE HONEYMOON IS OVER, MAYBE FOR GOOD: THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ISSUE BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT


12 Chap. L. Rev. 23 Chapman Law Review Summer 2008 Article THE HONEYMOON IS OVER, MAYBE FOR GOOD: THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ISSUE BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT Amanda Alquist [tippy title="*" header="off"]B.A., California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo; J.D. Candidate, University of La Verne College of Law, 2009. My article,…