Home

THE “CALIFORNIA EFFECT” & THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN FOOD: HOW CALIFORNIA’S GROWING CRACKDOWN ON FOOD & AGRICULTURE HARMS THE STATE & THE NATION


13 Chap. L. Rev. 357 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article THE “CALIFORNIA EFFECT” & THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN FOOD: HOW CALIFORNIA’S GROWING CRACKDOWN ON FOOD & AGRICULTURE HARMS THE STATE & THE NATION Baylen J. Linnekin [tippy title="*" header="off"]LL.M. candidate, Agricultural & Food Law, University of Arkansas. J.D.,…

CRYING OVER THE INFERRED EXISTENCE OF SPILLED MILK: THE DEMONSTRABLE ILLOGIC OF ORTEGA V. KMART


13 Chap. L. Rev. 297 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article CRYING OVER THE INFERRED EXISTENCE OF SPILLED MILK: THE DEMONSTRABLE ILLOGIC OF ORTEGA V. KMART Paul K. Hoffman [tippy title="*" header="off"]Attorney; Adjunct Professor of Law, Trinity Law School; B.A. in Economics, Westmont College; J.D., University of California at…

A CATASTROPHIC CONUNDRUM, BUT NOT A NUISANCE: WHY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH IS ILL-SUITED TO SET EMISSIONS RESTRICTIONS ON DOMESTIC ENERGY PRODUCERS THROUGH THE COMMON LAW NUISANCE DOCTRINE


13 Chap. L. Rev. 265 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article A CATASTROPHIC CONUNDRUM, BUT NOT A NUISANCE: WHY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH IS ILL-SUITED TO SET EMISSIONS RESTRICTIONS ON DOMESTIC ENERGY PRODUCERS THROUGH THE COMMON LAW NUISANCE DOCTRINE Matthew Hall [tippy title="*" header="off"]Riggs, Abney, Neal, Turpen, Orbison & Lewis,…

COMPARING PHILOSOPHIES AND PRACTICES OF FAMILY LAW BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER NATIONS: THE FLINTSTONES VS. THE JETSONS


13 Chap. L. Rev. 249 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article COMPARING PHILOSOPHIES AND PRACTICES OF FAMILY LAW BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER NATIONS: THE FLINTSTONES [tippy title="*" header="off"]Trademarked Hanna-Barbera Productions, Inc.[/tippy] VS. THE JETSONS [tippy title="**" header="off"]Trademarked Hanna-Barbera Productions, Inc.[/tippy] Marsha B. Freeman [tippy title="***" header="off"]Professor of Law, Barry…

PRO [WHOSE?] CHOICE: HOW THE GROWING RECOGNITION OF A FETUS’ RIGHT TO LIFE TAKES THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OUT OF ROE


13 Chap. L. Rev. 221 Chapman Law Review Fall 2009 Comment PRO [WHOSE?] CHOICE: HOW THE GROWING RECOGNITION OF A FETUS’ RIGHT TO LIFE TAKES THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OUT OF ROE Rachel Warren [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2010, Chapman University School of Law. B.S. Music Industry, University of Southern California. I would…

CHEMICAL CASTRATION FOR CHILD PREDATORS: PRACTICAL, EFFECTIVE, AND CONSTITUTIONAL


***Most Views – March 2014*** 13 Chap. L. Rev. 191 Chapman Law Review Fall 2009 Comment CHEMICAL CASTRATION FOR CHILD PREDATORS: PRACTICAL, EFFECTIVE, AND CONSTITUTIONAL Elizabeth M. Tullio [tippy title="*" header="off"]B.A., University of California, Irvine; J.D. expected May 2010, Chapman University School of Law. I would like to thank my family…

HEADS I WIN, TAILS YOU LOSE: THE DISPARATE TREATMENT OF SIMILARLY SITUATED TAXPAYERS UNDER THE PERSONAL INJURY INCOME TAX EXCLUSION


13 Chap. L. Rev. 161 Chapman Law Review Fall 2009 Comment HEADS I WIN, TAILS YOU LOSE: THE DISPARATE TREATMENT OF SIMILARLY SITUATED TAXPAYERS UNDER THE PERSONAL INJURY INCOME TAX EXCLUSION Habib Hanna [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate, Chapman University School of Law, May 2010; B.A. Political Science, California State University Fullerton,…

SOCRATES, SYLLOGISMS, AND SADISTIC TRANSACTIONS: CHALLENGES TO MASTERING U.C.C. ARTICLE 9 THROUGH DEDUCTIVE REASONING


13 Chap. L. Rev. 97 Chapman Law Review Fall 2009 Article SOCRATES, SYLLOGISMS, AND SADISTIC TRANSACTIONS: CHALLENGES TO MASTERING U.C.C. ARTICLE 9 THROUGH DEDUCTIVE REASONING Timothy R. Zinnecker [tippy title="*" header="off"]Harry and Helen Hutchens Research Professor, South Texas College of Law (tzinnecker@stcl.edu). Several friends were generous with their time and offered…