15 Chap. L. Rev. 707 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2012 Case Digests [tippy title="*" header="off"]Chapman Law Review selected these cases primarily for their legal significance. These cases are not exhaustive of the cases decided by the California Supreme Court during this period.[/tippy] DIGEST: POOSHS V. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.…

15 Chap. L. Rev. 701 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2012 Case Digests [tippy title="*" header="off"]Chapman Law Review selected these cases primarily for their legal significance. These cases are not exhaustive of the cases decided by the California Supreme Court during this period.[/tippy] DIGEST: CABRAL V. RALPHS GROCERY CO. Alis…

15 Chap. L. Rev. 693 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2012 Case Digests [tippy title="*" header="off"]Chapman Law Review selected these cases primarily for their legal significance. These cases are not exhaustive of the cases decided by the California Supreme Court during this period.[/tippy] DIGEST: BRUNS V. E-COMMERCE EXCHANGE, INC. Jaspreet…

15 Chap. L. Rev. 685 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2012 Case Digests [tippy title="*" header="off"]Chapman Law Review selected these cases primarily for their legal significance. These cases are not exhaustive of the cases decided by the California Supreme Court during this period.[/tippy] DIGEST: PEOPLE V. TROYER Katie M. Haldorsen…

15 Chap. L. Rev. 677 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2012 Case Digests [tippy title="*" header="off"]Chapman Law Review selected these cases primarily for their legal significance. These cases are not exhaustive of the cases decided by the California Supreme Court during this period.[/tippy] DIGEST: PINEDA V. WILLIAMS-SONOMA STORES, INC. Matthew…

15 Chap. L. Rev. 669 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2012 Case Digests [tippy title="*" header="off"]Chapman Law Review selected these cases primarily for their legal significance. These cases are not exhaustive of the cases decided by the California Supreme Court during this period.[/tippy] DIGEST: CORTEZ V. ABICH Briana DeLong Copyright…

15 Chap. L. Rev. 663 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2012 Case Digests [tippy title="*" header="off"]Chapman Law Review selected these cases primarily for their legal significance. These cases are not exhaustive of the cases decided by the California Supreme Court during this period.[/tippy] DIGEST: PEOPLE V. SOTO Kyle D. Mott…

15 Chap. L. Rev. 657 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2012 Case Digests [tippy title="*" header="off"]Chapman Law Review selected these cases primarily for their legal significance. These cases are not exhaustive of the cases decided by the California Supreme Court during this period.[/tippy] DIGEST: CASSEL V. SUPERIOR COURT Damon Pitt…

15 Chap. L. Rev. 613 Chapman Law Review Winter 2012 Comments JUST A MATTER OF FAIRNESS: WHAT THE FEDERAL RECOGNITION OF CALIFORNIA REGISTERED DOMESTIC PARTNERS MEANS IN THE FIGHT FOR TAX EQUITY Rebecca J. Kipper [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. candidate 2012 Chapman University School of Law. I would like to thank Professor…

15 Chap. L. Rev. 585 Chapman Law Review Winter 2012 Comments CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL ON TRACK? BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN COMPETING LAND USE ISSUES WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECT Kevin J. Grochow [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate, Chapman University School of Law, May 2012; B.A. History, University of California, Irvine, June…