ENSURING A RIGHT OF ACCESS TO THE COURTS FOR BIAS CRIME VICTIMS: A SECTION 5 DEFENSE OF THE MATTHEW SHEPARD ACT


12 Chap. L. Rev. 389 Chapman Law Review Fall 2008 Article ENSURING A RIGHT OF ACCESS TO THE COURTS FOR BIAS CRIME VICTIMS: A SECTION 5 DEFENSE OF THE MATTHEW SHEPARD ACT Jordan Blair Woods [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate, UCLA School of Law, 2009; A.B., Harvard College, 2006. Thanks to Professor…

RECASTING COMPLAINTS: AN ARGUMENT FOR PROCEDURAL ALTERNATIVES


12 Chap. L. Rev. 333 Chapman Law Review Fall 2008 Article RECASTING COMPLAINTS: AN ARGUMENT FOR PROCEDURAL ALTERNATIVES Paul David Menair [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D., Georgia State University, 2003.[/tippy] Copyright (c) 2008 Chapman Law Review; Paul David Menair In the time that has passed since the academic debate regarding “substance-specific” procedure reform…

EMPLOYERS BEWARE: VIOLATING USERRA THROUGH IMPROPER PRE-EMPLOYMENT INQUIRIES


12 Chap. L. Rev. 279 Chapman Law Review Fall 2008 Article EMPLOYERS BEWARE: VIOLATING USERRA THROUGH IMPROPER PRE-EMPLOYMENT INQUIRIES Captain Daniel J. Bugbee Copyright (c) 2008 Chapman Law Review; Captain Daniel J. Bugbee The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) provides a wide range of protections for those…

LIFE, LIBERTY, OR YOUR CHILDREN: CALIFORNIA PARENTS’ FIFTH AMENDMENT QUANDARY BETWEEN SELF-INCRIMINATION AND FAMILY PRESERVATION


12 Chap. L. Rev. 155 Chapman Law Review Summer 2008 Comment LIFE, LIBERTY, OR YOUR CHILDREN: CALIFORNIA PARENTS’ FIFTH AMENDMENT QUANDARY BETWEEN SELF-INCRIMINATION AND FAMILY PRESERVATION Kendra Weber [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2009, Chapman University School of Law. B.A. Criminal Justice, California State University, Fullerton. I would like to thank Frank…

NOTHING IS SACRED: WHY GEORGIA AND CALIFORNIA CANNOT BAR CONTRACTUAL JURY WAIVERS IN FEDERAL COURT


12 Chap. L. Rev. 127 Chapman Law Review Summer 2008 Comment NOTHING IS SACRED: WHY GEORGIA AND CALIFORNIA CANNOT BAR CONTRACTUAL JURY WAIVERS IN FEDERAL COURT Brian S. Thomley [tippy title="*" header="off"] J.D. Candidate 2009, Chapman University School of Law. I wish to thank Professor Henry Noyes for the idea for…

THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF THE CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL THROWS A CURVEBALL: THE USE OF JUVENILE ADJUDICATIONS AS STRIKES IN CALIFORNIA POST-PEOPLE V. NGUYEN


12 Chap. L. Rev. 107 Chapman Law Review Summer 2008 Comment THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF THE CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL THROWS A CURVEBALL: THE USE OF JUVENILE ADJUDICATIONS AS STRIKES IN CALIFORNIA POST-PEOPLE V. NGUYEN Benjamin Price [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2009, Chapman University School of Law; B.A. 2006, Brigham Young…

CALIFORNIA’S DETERMINATE SENTENCING LAW: HOW CALIFORNIA GOT IT WRONG . . . TWICE


12 Chap. L. Rev. 87 Chapman Law Review Summer 2008 Comment CALIFORNIA’S DETERMINATE SENTENCING LAW: HOW CALIFORNIA GOT IT WRONG . . . TWICE Travis Bailey [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2009, Chapman University School of Law. Thanks to Kris Warren and Mike Khalilpour for their support and insight.[/tippy] Copyright (c) 2008…

MEDICAL MARIJUANA AND THE LIMITS OF THE COMPASSIONATE USE ACT: ROSS V. RAGINGWIRE TELECOMMUNICATIONS


12 Chap. L. Rev. 71 Chapman Law Review Summer 2008 Article MEDICAL MARIJUANA AND THE LIMITS OF THE COMPASSIONATE USE ACT: ROSS V. RAGINGWIRE TELECOMMUNICATIONS Deborah J. La Fetra [tippy title="*" header="off"]Principal Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation; J.D. 1990, University of Southern California Law Center. Ms. La Fetra filed an amicus…