13 Chap. L. Rev. 417 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Comment ONE STEP AT A TIME: REFORMING DRUG DIVERSION PROGRAMS IN CALIFORNIA Megan N. Krebbeks [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2010, Chapman University School of Law; B.A. 2007, University of Rochester. I would like to thank my parents, John and…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 391 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Comment RECOGNIZING AND REGULATING HOME SCHOOLING IN CALIFORNIA: BALANCING PARENTAL AND STATE INTERESTS IN EDUCATION Paul A. Alarcón [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2010, Chapman University School of Law; B.A. 2007, Thomas Aquinas College. Prospective Law Clerk to the Honorable…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 357 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article THE “CALIFORNIA EFFECT” & THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN FOOD: HOW CALIFORNIA’S GROWING CRACKDOWN ON FOOD & AGRICULTURE HARMS THE STATE & THE NATION Baylen J. Linnekin [tippy title="*" header="off"]LL.M. candidate, Agricultural & Food Law, University of Arkansas. J.D.,…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 307 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article TIME TO BURY THE SHOCKS THE CONSCIENCE TEST Rosalie Berger Levinson [tippy title="*" header="off"]Phyllis and Richard Duesenberg Professor of Law, Valparaiso University School of Law.[/tippy] Copyright (c) 2010 Chapman Law Review; Rosalie Berger Levinson The Supreme Court has…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 297 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article CRYING OVER THE INFERRED EXISTENCE OF SPILLED MILK: THE DEMONSTRABLE ILLOGIC OF ORTEGA V. KMART Paul K. Hoffman [tippy title="*" header="off"]Attorney; Adjunct Professor of Law, Trinity Law School; B.A. in Economics, Westmont College; J.D., University of California at…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 265 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article A CATASTROPHIC CONUNDRUM, BUT NOT A NUISANCE: WHY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH IS ILL-SUITED TO SET EMISSIONS RESTRICTIONS ON DOMESTIC ENERGY PRODUCERS THROUGH THE COMMON LAW NUISANCE DOCTRINE Matthew Hall [tippy title="*" header="off"]Riggs, Abney, Neal, Turpen, Orbison & Lewis,…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 249 (No PDF) Chapman Law Review Winter 2010 Article COMPARING PHILOSOPHIES AND PRACTICES OF FAMILY LAW BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER NATIONS: THE FLINTSTONES [tippy title="*" header="off"]Trademarked Hanna-Barbera Productions, Inc.[/tippy] VS. THE JETSONS [tippy title="**" header="off"]Trademarked Hanna-Barbera Productions, Inc.[/tippy] Marsha B. Freeman [tippy title="***" header="off"]Professor of Law, Barry…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 221 Chapman Law Review Fall 2009 Comment PRO [WHOSE?] CHOICE: HOW THE GROWING RECOGNITION OF A FETUS’ RIGHT TO LIFE TAKES THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OUT OF ROE Rachel Warren [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate 2010, Chapman University School of Law. B.S. Music Industry, University of Southern California. I would…

***Most Views – March 2014*** 13 Chap. L. Rev. 191 Chapman Law Review Fall 2009 Comment CHEMICAL CASTRATION FOR CHILD PREDATORS: PRACTICAL, EFFECTIVE, AND CONSTITUTIONAL Elizabeth M. Tullio [tippy title="*" header="off"]B.A., University of California, Irvine; J.D. expected May 2010, Chapman University School of Law. I would like to thank my family…

13 Chap. L. Rev. 161 Chapman Law Review Fall 2009 Comment HEADS I WIN, TAILS YOU LOSE: THE DISPARATE TREATMENT OF SIMILARLY SITUATED TAXPAYERS UNDER THE PERSONAL INJURY INCOME TAX EXCLUSION Habib Hanna [tippy title="*" header="off"]J.D. Candidate, Chapman University School of Law, May 2010; B.A. Political Science, California State University Fullerton,…